http://popcritics.disqus.com/Reviewing pop culture so you don't have toenMon, 21 Apr 2008 11:45:24 -0000http://www.popcritics.com/2008/04/denzel-washington-attached-to-robert-ludlum%e2%80%99s-matarese-circle/#comment-1336709Greengrass might be too busy making all the Bourne movies...JasonMon, 21 Apr 2008 11:45:24 -0000http://www.popcritics.com/2008/04/denzel-washington-attached-to-robert-ludlum%e2%80%99s-matarese-circle/#comment-1336710If they want it to be as good at the Bourne films, then get Paul Greengrass :)MikeMon, 21 Apr 2008 11:35:45 -0000http://www.popcritics.com/2008/04/denzel-washington-attached-to-robert-ludlum%e2%80%99s-matarese-circle/#comment-1336711With Denzel in the picture, probably worth rolling the dice. Script details sound like a role that Denzel would do well in.Kory KellyMon, 21 Apr 2008 11:31:24 -0000http://www.popcritics.com/2008/04/denzel-washington-attached-to-robert-ludlum%e2%80%99s-matarese-circle/#comment-1336712Plot line sounds interesting, denzel working with his nemisis could make for a good twist/exciting movie.Cap'n SchwartzMon, 21 Apr 2008 11:08:15 -0000http://www.popcritics.com/2008/04/denzel-washington-attached-to-robert-ludlum%e2%80%99s-matarese-circle/#comment-1336714It doesn't matter how many Bourne novels there were, as Hollywood never followed anything but the names and the initial concept of the amnesiac killer (or was he? :) ) anyway. I can see necessary differences -- Carlos was caught already, and he wasn't the big guy internationally he'd been before anyway at that point, but I don't like when they take a good name and throw most of the content away and start over.RobertMon, 21 Apr 2008 11:00:32 -0000