http://popcritics.disqus.com/Reviewing pop culture so you don't have toenMon, 28 Apr 2008 15:41:43 -0000http://www.popcritics.com/2008/04/movie-review-baby-mama-2008/#comment-1339092All the clips I've seen have been really funny. Is it one of those movies where all the funny stuff is already in the commercials so it's not funny anymore when you're sitting in the theater?AnaMon, 28 Apr 2008 15:41:43 -0000http://www.popcritics.com/2008/04/movie-review-baby-mama-2008/#comment-1339089I think he was a little hard on it, but go (or wait and rent it) and decide for yourself.jinaMon, 28 Apr 2008 14:13:07 -0000http://www.popcritics.com/2008/04/movie-review-baby-mama-2008/#comment-1339091If Mike, who loves Tina Fey only slightly less than Jina (I'm just assuming), only gave it a 5.5, what chance does it have of even breaking .500 for the rest of us? I'm disappointed. I was hoping it would be really good.JasonMon, 28 Apr 2008 12:24:48 -0000http://www.popcritics.com/2008/04/movie-review-baby-mama-2008/#comment-1339090Disappointed to hear the movie was not better.KoryMon, 28 Apr 2008 11:48:36 -0000http://www.popcritics.com/2008/04/movie-review-baby-mama-2008/#comment-1339094ok so hows this for making it unpredicatable.. what if Sigourney Weaver was Ripley in this movie and implanted Alien embryo's into surrogate mothers?!!? Huh? ya... hows that for a twist!!Cap'n SchwartzMon, 28 Apr 2008 11:39:52 -0000http://www.popcritics.com/2008/04/movie-review-baby-mama-2008/#comment-1339093I figure 5 is average, so I thought it was just an average movie...it got a point-5 because Tina Fey was in it :)MikeMon, 28 Apr 2008 11:37:45 -0000http://www.popcritics.com/2008/04/movie-review-baby-mama-2008/#comment-1339095I thought it was better than a 5.5! But I agree that it was highly predictable.jinaMon, 28 Apr 2008 11:31:10 -0000